UCL African Graduate Scholarship

Leave a comment

From: Garcia-Paredes, Paloma
Sent: 16 March 2012 15:31
Subject: African Graduate Scholarship

 

Dear all,

I am writing to ask for your assistance in promoting the African Graduate Scholarship offered at the Centre for International Health and Development.

I would appreciate if you forward this e-mail to anyone who you think would be interested. Thank you very much for your help.

 

UCL Centre for International Health and Development

 

African Graduate Scholarship

 

We are now accepting application to the UCL African Graduate Scholarship

This scholarship exists to support African nationals with a high-quality academic and professional who wish to further develop their skills and knowledge in their specific field. The Scholarship is a one-off award for the academic year September-September for a postgraduate programme in Global Health and Development or International Child Health. The scholarship covers tuition, accommodation and living expenses for one year.

For further information please visit the departmental website:

http://www.ucl.ac.uk/cihd/postgraduate

and the scholarship web page

http://www.ucl.ac.uk/cihd/postgraduate/scholarships-funding

 

The Deadline to apply is: 11th May 2012

 

For questions please contact

Paloma Garcia-Paredes
Institute of Child Health
30 Guilford Street
London WC1N 1EH

Email: p.garcia-paredes@ucl.ac.uk
Tel: +44 (0) 20 7905 2646
Fax: +44 (0) 20 7404 2062
Website: www.ucl.ac.uk/cihd/postgraduate

 

 

 

Paloma Garcia-Paredes

Teaching Coordinator

UCL Institute for Global Health

30 Guilford Street

WC1N 1EH

Phone: 020 7905 2646

E-mail: p.garcia-paredes@ucl.ac.uk

 

MSc/Postgraduate Diploma and Certificate in Global Health and Development http://www.ucl.ac.uk/global-health/education

MSc/ Postgraduate Diploma and Certificate in International Child Health http://www.ucl.ac.uk/cihd/postgraduate/index

 

Follow us on TWITTER @UCLGlobalHealthn

Somaliland is an overlooked African Success Story

1 Comment

An admittedly old, but still excellent article about Somaliland.  Many thanks to mr. balayah for forwarding it to me!

 

Somaliland is an overlooked African success story

By Jeffrey Gettleman

Published:  Wednesday, March 7, 2007

HARGEYSA, Somalia — When the sun rises over the craggy hills of Hargeysa, it sheds light on a different kind of Somalia.

Ice cream trucks hit the streets. Money changers, unarmed and unguarded, push cash through the market in wheelbarrows. Politicians from three distinct parties get ready for another day of debate, which recently included animated discussion on registering nomadic voters.

It is all part of a Somali puzzle: how one area of the country, the northwest, also known as Somaliland, can seem so peaceful and functional — so normal, in fact — while the rest continues to be such a violent, chaotic mess.

This tale of two Somalias is especially striking now, as thousands of African Union peacekeepers prepare to rescue Mogadishu, the nation’s capital, from itself. The internationally backed transitional government that seized Mogadishu in late December with Ethiopia’s help says it cannot survive without foreign aid and foreign peacekeepers to quell clan fighting and an escalating insurgency.

Residents of Somaliland, who have wrestled with their own clan conflicts, find this ridiculous.

“You can’t be donated power,” said Dahir Rayale Kahin, president of the republic of Somaliland, which has long declared itself independent from the rest of Somalia. “We built this state because we saw the problems here as our problems. Our brothers in the south are still waiting — till now — for others.”

But Somalilanders are waiting, too: waiting to be recognized. In 1991, as Somalia’s government disintegrated and clan fighting in the south spun out of control, Somaliland, traditionally one of the poorest parts of Somalia, claimed its independence.

But no country acknowledges it as a separate state, and very few even contribute aid — which makes Somaliland’s success all the more intriguing

. Its leaders, with no Western experts at their elbow, have designed a political system that minimizes clan rivalries while carving out a special role for clan elders, the traditional pillars of Somali society.

They have demobilized thousands of the young gunmen who still plague southern Somalia and melded them into a national army. They have held three rounds of multiparty elections, no small feat in a region, the Horn of Africa, where multiparty democracy is mostly a rumor. Somalia, for one, has not had free elections since the 1960s.

Of course, Somaliland has not always been so stable and Somalia has not always been so chaotic. Even now, critics say the Somaliland government can be repressive and inefficient, and the mental hospital in Hargeysa, the capital of Somaliland, seem to be evidence of both — patients are chained to their beds in dark, smelly rooms.

But Somalilanders are quick to point out that at least they have a mental hospital, which the more populous south does not. Their steady, underdog efforts to sculpt a functioning state from the ruins of war seems to dispel the notion that Somalia is an inherently ungovernable, warlike place.

So, what happened?

“It all goes back to the Brits,” according to Hajji Abdi Waraabe, an 89-year- old member of Somaliland’s upper house of Parliament.

When the colonial powers sliced up the Horn of Africa in the 19th century, the British got Somaliland and the Italians got southern Somalia.

While the British relied mostly on clan chiefs to govern, the Italians created an entire Italian-speaking administration and imported thousands of people from Italy to farm bananas, build cathedrals and teach the people how to pour espresso.

The result was that Mogadishu, along the southern coast, became a major commercial hub and one of the most beautiful cities in Africa, but its traditional systems of authority were weakened.

That is partly why, many Somalia analysts say, warlords were able to outmuscle clan elders and dominate Mogadishu in the vacuum that formed after the central government fell.

The British, on the other hand, never invested much in Somaliland, leaving it poor and dusty but with its traditions more or less intact. The two territories were granted independence in 1960 and quickly merged to form the Somali Republic, but it was never a happy marriage. By the 1980s, the Somali National Movement, a northern rebel group, was blowing up government posts.

In 1988, government fighter-bombers, at the orders of President Mohamed Siad Barre, flattened Hargeysa, killing 50,000 civilians.

The Somali National Movement proved indispensable in the fragile years after the Barre government collapsed. It set up the guurti, a council of wise men from every clan, which soon evolved into an official decision-making body. Most of the men were illiterate herders but they became the glue that held Somaliland together.

In a sparsely populated nomadic society, where many people live far from government services, clan elders are traditionally the ones to reconcile differences and maintain social order.

“They were a cushion,” said Ahmed Mohammed Silanyo, the leader of Somaliland’s main opposition party. “Whenever there was friction, these old men would step in and say, ‘What’s wrong with you boys? Stay together.'”

In the 1990s, while clan warlords in Mogadishu were leveling the city’s fine Italian architecture, the guurti, along with rebel leaders, were building a government.

Somaliland, like southern Somalia, was awash with weapons and split by warring clans. Their first step was persuading the militiamen to give up their guns — a goal that still seems remote in the south. They moved slowly, first taking the armed pickups, then the heavy guns and ultimately leaving light weapons in the hands of the people.

Again, this stood in contrast to the south, where thousands of American marines and UN peacekeepers in the early 1990s failed to put a dent in the clan violence.

“We had a higher purpose,” said Abdillahi Duale, Somaliland’s foreign minister. “Independence. And nobody on the outside world was going to help us get there.”

That would prove to be a theme here. The less outside help, the better. Over the years southern Somalia has received tens of millions — if not hundreds of millions — of dollars in aid, Somaliland almost nothing.

The difference is striking, though it is true that Somaliland may be easier to govern with its smaller population, an estimated 2.5 million compared with 6 million in the south.

For elections in 2002, Somaliland leaders devised a system specifically to check clan power.

They limited the number of political parties to three to prevent a repeat of the fragmentation of the 1960s, when nationwide elections spawned more than 60 political parties, essentially one for each subclan. It was an attempt to create parties based on ideology, not tribe, something that has proven difficult across Africa.

Toby Kenyon: Somaliland Sovereignty

Leave a comment

Toby Kenyon has written an interesting and articulate message on the issue of Somaliland sovereignty, which I felt was worthy of sharing with you all, so….here it is:

 

The major International Conference , on the many acute problems in and around The Horn of Africa , held in London on 23 February 2012 , has ignored the nation of four million people whose peaceful and democratic country is in the very centre of this turbulent and chaotic area .

The African Union makes two excuses for the ignoring the stability of The Republic of Somaliland :–

1………. “” AU aims to get all the countries of Africa under one flag “”

2………..”” In a divorce two parties are involved , therefore both parties have to be in agreement before any change happens “”

The United Kingdom has enough years of diplomatic experience to tactfully overcome such arrant nonsensical policies .

Knowledge of the Somaliland frontiers surveyed and agreed by Clan leaders in 1884 , is the start for intelligent discussion .

Then knowledge is essential of The Somali Republic for the true understanding of the devious methods adopted by the government of The Somali Republic in the capital city of Mogadishu from 1 July 1960 to 18 May 1991 to thwart the progress and wishes of Somaliland . Somalilanders had made , in good faith , the hasty unratified agreement with Somalia , for the experimental one year union ,.which was to have been tested under fair conditions in June 1961 by a referendum . But Somalia, THE LARGER POPULATION , reneged on the unratified ” agreement “

Today , in 2012 , The United Kingdom will gain both economically and strategically by proposing peacefully at The General Assembly of The United Nations Organisation that The Republic of Somaliland is accepted ……… politically ………..into the world community again ( as she was on 26 June 1960 before the start of The Somali Republic , and on the ending of The British Somaliland Protectorate . ) .

The United Kingdom has two reasons for refusing the request of Somaliland for sovereignty : —

1……….”” It is for the Somalians and the African Union to approve the sovereignty of The Republic of Somaliland . “”

2……..””As UK was the former imperial power , UK MIGHT BE ” PERCEIVED ” AS GUILTY OF ” NEO-COLONIALISM “

The replies to AU and UK inaction on the Somaliland Case are : —

A……… The African Union specifically sent a Fact-Finding Mission to Somaliland in 2005 in order to ascertain the legal right of the de facto Somaliland to complete independence ( like Eritrea and places outside Africa which had been given UN membership with much weaker claims to independence ) . The AU Mission recommended to the Council of AU that The Republic of Somaliland has all the requirements of de jure status forthwith . The AU Council is failing to action the recommendation of their own Fact-Finding Mission of 2005 . .

B……..UK ” fear ” in FCO that ” perceived neo-colonialism ” might upset other nations , ( which have poorer records on human rights than Somaliland ) , needs to be put to the test in the normal manner of UN General Assembly peaceful Debate . We created UN as a ” better ” committee than The League of Nations , yet we fail to use UNGA in this most vital case .

………Failure to debate peacefully due to ” an ill-defined sense of colonial guilt and fear ” , fifty – one years after the amicable end of The Protectorate , is the pathetic and basest deriliction of UK moral Duty and obligation , after we have received requests , frequently , from Somalilanders that UK is the nation which they wish to lead in the peaceful debate .

The Cold War was the reason that our attention missed the genocide of Somalians on the population of Somaliland .

Somalilanders are showing the world that their stability is equal to the most ” advanced ” countries of the world ……..But we deny them the security which comes with UN membership .

The disputed frontiers , which may be taken to The International Court of Justice at The Hague by two nations , can only be settled when Somaliland is a nation again .

Somalilanders will remain separate from Somalia , even when Somalia changes to become the best paradise-utopia in the world . Somalilanders are faithful moderate Muslims , who have respect for civilized ways ……….They will keep their excellent development and motherland inviolate .

For UK to perpetuate the limbo status of Somaliland is bad for UK as stated in Parliament by The Prime Minister on 7 July 2010 .. Somalilanders have shown that they are best fighters in the world , in WW 1 & 2 and the Civil War when Somalilanders defeated Somalia which is three times greater and was armed by the Soviets .

The 23 February 2012 Conference in London was preceded by 7,000 peaceful happy Somalilanders in Whitehall witnessing their Petition for Sovereignty being delivered to 10 Downing Street . The President of The Republic of Somaliland was invited , and attended the Conference ……….

Will The United Kingdom now act at The United Nations for Somaliland’s Sovereignty ?